We discussed already on this blog about how our conception of “classical Indian philosophy” is contingent and historically determined. For instance, if you were to ask me what “classical Indian philosophy” for me means, I would at first answer with Continue reading Before “Classical Indian Philosophy”: the influence of the Sāṅkhya logic UPDATED
Co-sponsored by the Philosophy Department at SUNY-Binghamton, the 49th Annual Conference of the Society for Asian and Comparative Philosophy will be held at SUNY-Binghamton’s campus in the beautiful environs of upstate New York.. The conference theme, “Universality and Particularity,” is Continue reading Call for Papers: SACP 2014
Here is the link for the newest edition of the Philosophers’ Carnival. If you agree that it should include also the perspectives and stimuli of other points of view (e.g., of Indian philosophy), make a point to submit proposals for Continue reading Philosophers’ Carnival No. 159
You can now get new Indian Philosophy Blog posts in your email inbox. Just scroll down the right sidebar to “Subscribe to Blog via Email” and enter your address. We won’t share your email with third parties without your consent.
Can a theist believe in God’s omniscience&omnipotence and in free will? I have argued in other posts that one can think in a compatibilist way (because God wants to be freely loved) and that this entails that no punishment/ban from Continue reading A theist caught in the paradoxes of free will
On behalf of Chris Framarin: The University of British Columbia is hosting the The Second Canadian Colloquium for Ancient Philosophy, May 2-4, 2014. Please note that the organizers expressly include Indian philosophy within the call for papers. The University of Continue reading Call for Papers: The Second Canadian Colloquium for Ancient Philosophy
In the number of years I have been teaching both Indian and Chinese philosophical traditions, I have found that the topic that students in general have the most trouble engaging with is that of “release from rebirth.” Of course, this Continue reading Mokṣa and the Undergraduate Classroom
A short terminological excursus: bhāvanā is a rather common name throughout Sanskrit philosophy (it designates, e.g., a peculiar meditation in Buddhism and in Kashmir Śivaism, a linguistic function in Bhāṭṭa Nāyaka’s aesthetical theory, etc.). It is also found in grammar. Continue reading What did Kumārila have in view when he spoke of a “linguistic force” and of an “objective force”?
Recently I read a very interesting argument in Kumārila’s remarks on the authority of ritual manuals (Kalpasūtrādhikaraṇa, Tantravārtika on Mīmāṃsasūtra 1.3.11–14) which deployed a very familiar concept, the textual coherence of the Veda, in an unexpected way. To put it Continue reading Coherence and intentionality: Kumārila on the Kalpasūtras
Friends, please forgive the shameless self-promotion. The volume that Edwin Bryant and I have edited, Free Will, Agency, and Selfhood in Indian Philosophy, has just been released by Oxford University Press. The origin of the book lies in conversations that Edwin Continue reading Book Notice: Free Will, Agency, and Selfhood in Indian Philosophy